A Raisin in the Sun Book Review Essay Example for Free

A Raisin in the Sun Book Review Essay A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry is a truly exquisite piece of literature that has influenced readers, young and old, for generations. It gives us a very realistic view of racial tension, as well as the socioeconomic struggles, African Americans faced during the late 1940s-50s. In this play we meet the Youngers, a lower-class, diverse-minded, African American family simply trying to survive in 1950s South Chicago. Together they face economic hardship, racial discrimination, and the constant struggle to keep a fragile family together as each member searches for their version of the â€Å"American Dream†. Hansberry did an excellent job in creating the Younger family to represent lower class African American families in the 1950s. The Youngers live in a rundown, two-bedroom apartment. The family consists of Mama, Walter, Ruth, Travis, and Beneatha. The economic aspect of the play is centered around the insurance check Mama will be getting for her late husband, the author uses this to create a foundation for the Youngers story; the money elicits conflict between the characters as each has their own idea on what to do with money that does not even belong to them. A major motif in this play is racism, the author allows for a bit of foreshadowing in the beginning of the play with the bombing of another African American family in Clybourne Park, a mainly white community and the area where Mama eventually buys the new family house. Hansberry uses Walter to tie these two themes together. After losing all of the money Mama gave him to invest in his business and to save for Beneatha’s college fund, he then goes to get more money by selling back Mama’s new house: he can either overcome the racism and be the man his mother always knew he could be, or he can take the money for another chance to pursue his dreams but at the same time he would essentially be selling his soul to the devil. Walter must choose to either satiate his thirst for wealth or maintain the pride of his race. Finally, Hansberry acknowledges the importance of family unity during  these times. Ruth and Mama are the two main characters attempting to hold everything together. Hansberry made these characters strong and full of hope, despite their situation in life. Created any other way and we would probably see the family fall apart as the story began to unfold. Money and racism are also huge tests on the strength of this family as they struggle through the hardships of poverty and realize the shortcomings of some of the family members. All in all, A Raisin in the Sun is a very well written book. It is written in such a way that really puts you in the cramped, living conditions with the Youngers and helps readers to understand what it meant to be a poor African American family in the 1950s. Hansberry did a great job in creating solid characters which help to develop the story smoothly and realistically. It was a play I thoroughly enjoyed reading and would readily suggest to anyone looking for a good read.

Dramatica Theory and James Washington Square :: James Washington Square

Dramatica Theory and James' Washington Square In this essay I will review a critique of James' Washington Square. I found the critique to be dry and rather clinical in its approach to this fine work by Henry James. From the beginning the article presents a cold psychological approach to the characters that James' has made live for me in the short novel. The article covers the character's name, gender, a short description of him or her, the role that character plays in the piece and then goes on to list the basic characteristics of him or her. Motivation, methodology, evaluation and purpose are the four characteristics that are used to describe a character. The analysis does refer to the original work in many places. I found this to be helpful. For example when it describes Catherine Sloper it takes a quote from the novel to list her as, "a dull, plain girl she was called by rigorous critics" (James 11). This did help redeem the article somewhat. But the basic problem I found with the analysis kept leaping up. It's too scientific an approach for any literary work. The main problem with "Dramatica," for me, seems to be in that the theory looks at a story in relation to, "the mind's problem solving process" ("What is Dramatica?"). This area of the website goes on to explain that an author must examine all possible solutions to an issue in the story. In an effort to prove that the author's solutions are the best. The Dramatica theory of critique states that if, "you have covered every angle in your argument, you've mapped all the ways an audience might look at the problem and, therefore, all the ways anyone might look at that problem" ("What is Dramatica?"). This mapping turns any piece into a psychological pseudo study and relieves it of any beauty that it may contain.

Introduction in methods Essay

Background of the Study Living in a postmodern world is dominated by electronic gadgets, cyber technology and scientific and genetic breakthroughs. In spite of the fact that the Philippines are still just in the process of industrializing, it manages to cope with global trend of development and industrialization. Technology today is the biggest part of an individual. Elections have been the usual mechanism by which modern democracy operates since the 17th century. It is where people used a specialized computer to vote their candidate instead of the usual ballot boxes where people cast their votes by way of writing on the ballot. Voting is an election which is formal and critical decision making by which a population chooses an individual. This process is also used in many other private organizations, corporations and now in universities. Automate voting system is a combination of mechanical, electromechanical, or electronic equipment. It includes the software required to program, control, this is where people used a specialized computer to vote their candidate instead of the usual ballot boxes where people cast their votes by way of writing on the ballot. This process provides much more efficiency and reliability than the conventional way of voting. After the voting process, the system will tally immediately the winners for the particular position. And also this system is faster and can give out result of the election in a matter of days instead of the secret  balloting where it will take weeks or even months before a result could be presented to the University. Every year, there is an election happening in Student of Supreme Council. It is an activity wherein each student is required to choose from a set of candidates who will represent each position in the Student Council. Supreme Student Council in Arellano University is the highest governing body of the student organization. The Arellano University Supreme Council shall be composed of two departments, namely the Executive Department and Legislative. Each college shall have two representatives. The officers of the executive department shall be elected by the ballot of the students and the representatives to the Legislative Department shall be elected by ballot within their respected colleges. The election shall be held not later than the 4th week of the month of the second semester. Wherein the Voting Process is handled by the IT Department. This Voting System enforces rules and regulations to ensure valid voting, and how votes are counted and aggregated to yield a final result. Statement of the Problem This study aims to decrease the time and effort of the participants of the specific election which leads to the delayed results. 1. The voting of the supreme 2. Avoid trickery of the votes 3. Second you need to give your id to them in order for them to validate if you are officially enrolled in Arellano University, in case you do not have the your student id card, you can give your registration form Objectives A. General Objectives The general objective of this study is to provide a system with source code that the Arellano University. B. Specific Objectives Specially, it aims to: 1. To design a system that will be user-friendly or easy to use,In order to secure the votes of the students. 2. To create a system that can help the school to reduce the time consume when voting. Enhance the speed and efficiency of voting process. 3. To create a system, to avoid trickery in order to be equal to all candidates. Scope and Limitations of the Study: The Automated Voting System focuses only on the election of Arellano University Main Campus and will only show the results of election and the percentage of students who vote on each department. It is use annually in Arellano University and it did for the students are able to use it automated rather than manually. Significance of the Study: It is intended to conduct this study because it is important to know the use of the Automated Voting System in the modern world today. And to know more what are the advantages and disadvantages of this systematic process of election. This study is deemed beneficial to the following: This Automated Voting System is for all the students of Arellano University and also to all the students who are willing to become the Student Officer of the University. This System is to establish and maintain controls that can ensure that accidents, inadvertent mistakes, and errors are minimized. And this Systematic process can avoid trickery in voting in order to secure the votes of everyone. . The students will encourage to vote immediately because of the new system. To make the voting process easier and faster. For students, this study may not only represent the feedback of the electorate to the student council but will also raise awareness on the advantages and disadvantages of the automated election system. It may also encourage active participation by the students and by the Arellano University executives. For the Future Researchers the results of this study can be used as basis for future researchers. The outcome of the study can be used as reference to similar studies especially with regards to the automated election system in the Philippines. C. Schedule of Activities(Activities and Guidelines) Activities W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 Planning and Data Gathering Analyzing and Designing Coding Testing and Improving Prototype Implementing the System Evaluating the System Documenting the System D. Resource Requirement Reading Resources: The New Constitution of the A.U.S.S.C Software: Visual Basic .NET (VB S SQL or Structured Query Language.NET) 2008 Hardware: PROCESSOR: NAME: Pentium ® Dual-Core CPU OPERATING SYSTEM: WINDOWS 7 Ultimate 32-bit (6.1, Build 7600) SYSTEM MODEL: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. MEMORY: 2048MB RAM CHIP TYPE: GeForce G102M E. Expected Output

Stereotypes In The Series No Tomorrow - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 7 Words: 2117 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2019/04/12 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Stereotypes Essay Did you like this example? Although the series No Tomorrow ended up being canceled after it aired one season on the CW television network, it has been deemed pleasurable, humorous, and thought provoking, with an intriguing plot twist. No Tomorrow addresses issues real people experience throughout their life such as: conflicts within relationships, acceptance of yourself and others, and growing as an adult due to making life changing decisions, while also breaking societal stereotypes for the romantic-comedy genre, as well as television as a whole, depicting the importance of diversity and welcoming change. In the beginning of the series, we meet the main character, Evie; a tall, goofy, beautiful blonde, who works a dissatisfying job in a warehouse that is similar to Amazon, with a boss named Deirdre, that is rude and undermining, along with Evies two best friends and coworkers, Hank and Kareema, who help Evie through difficult times, while also facing their own day to day problems. There is also Timothy, Evies on and off again boyfriend, who is so soft spoken, that at times, he needs subtitles for you to know what he is saying. The second leading role of the show is Xavier, the attractive, british guy Evie meets in a local farmers market, who believes the world is going to end in approximately eight months, due to his complex mathematical findings that proved an asteroid was on track to collide with Earth, thus he leaves his life of boring employment and unhappiness, in exchange for freedom and fulfillment. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Stereotypes In The Series No Tomorrow" essay for you Create order Xavier plans to spend what little time he has left completing his apocalyst, which is a journal he filled with different activities, goals, and desires he wishes to accomplish before the world ends. He also tries to spread the word of his findings to others in the world, and even the government, but is viewed as crazy and dismissed until the last episode of the series. Evie was also on the fence about Xaviers theory, but eventually decided that she needed change in her life by giving it purpose and fulfillment, while also still keeping her responsibilities as a working class citizen, thus beginning the romance between Evie and Xavier, and their continuous checking off of apocalyst items. She does, however, state that she does not necessarily believe the world was going to end, but rather is these changes for her self-betterment (Yates). Other characters follow Evies lead, creating their own version of an apocalyst, leading to more community involvement in simply living happier lives. Xavier and his theory creates the plot twist of doomsday prepping, while also altering the romcom genre by morphing a terrifying theory, along with its negative impacts, into a more positive, and uplifting vibe. The final episode ends with each character beginning a new chapter in their lives with confidence, including Evie and Xavier, who discover that they want different things out of life at the moment (Weidenfeld). Essentially, the purpose of the show is not to fulfill your wildest dreams, but to achieve things you want in life, while dealing with all the difficulty it may entail, leaving the viewer feeling optimistic about the future at the end of each episode (Jones). The most notable piece of ground breaking screenplay present in the show is ironically seen in its diverse supporting characters, varying in race, size, gender, sexual orientation, and beliefs. One positive review, No Tomorrow: TV Show Review, written by Gupta Saab, explains that even though there were some rom com cliches that were evident, the show had very few, and that he enjoyed the series even more because of actor variation and how race, nor ethnicity impacted the characters personas. Saab claimed to have wanted to see even more diversity because it was so pleasing to the eye. He does, however, state that the supporting characters could use more screen time, but are still, Interesting and dimensional. Many critics and viewers agree with Saab, elaborating that these aspects of the show made the audience come back for more, due to its light-hearted temperament and character relatability to its audience. In contrast to Saab, Jen Chaney offered more harsh critiques of No Tomorrow in her article, The CWs No Tomorrow is Mostly Pleasurable, Breezy Fun, suggesting that the show will most likely flop due to its overloaded plot within the first episode, explaining that it seemed more like a condensed film than a television series. She notes that the show is too fast-paced, and needs to dive deeper into the characters, and should avoid the use of cliches in dialogue. Chaney further iterations that the only way the series will become successful is through the leading roles and how the actors convey their relationship throughout the season, along with the viewers ability to embrace its fictional elements and ignore contrivances of the script. She ends her conclusion with the comment, No Tomorrow is more about a woman trying to connect with her own bliss, while maybe finding a guy in the process, than the story of a girl seeking nothing more than a boy. Admittedly, theres a very fine line betwe en those two types of quests. No Tomorrow may be able to stay on the more interesting side of that delicate divide. As to whether it actually pulls that off, as Evie might say: Let me get back to you, alluding to its possibility of failure in comparison to other popular CW series such as Jane the Virgin and Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, that have the same producers. Chaney does not completely dismiss the show, describing its potential to develop into a success as, Pleasurable, breezy fun, but contradicts Saab in advocating that the characters lack depth, completely overlooking key qualities of their subcultures. Although, I can agree with Chaney that the first episode plot was slightly overdone; thus I understand her concern, as it may have been too overwhelming for some viewers to want to continue watching. My view, however, coincides predominantly with Gupta Saab, in that the characters possess depth as the show progresses, even though there are a limited number of episodes available. Furthermore, I concur that No Tomorrow expresses a sufficient amount of insight on the characters personas between dialogue, body language, and how their personalities and desires unfold from the social and physical environments around them, while also displaying various subcultures that lack stereotypical depictions based on the actors ethnicity. Many characters defy a stereotype, in some way, within the show. For Evie, the viewer first perceives her as a stereotypical blonde that is attractive, yet lacks confidence, and sticks with the status quo (Yates). Overtime, she starts to show the depth of her personality and internal struggles she has about wanting something more for herself. This is first revealed when she rejects Timothys proposal to her by saying she needs time to think. It is also exhibited when she takes a stand against Xavier. He decided to take matters into his own hands, and got her fired from her job, thinking it would help push her along in his direction of living a free-spirited lifestyle. Evies personally would generally fall weak in competition with someone like Xavier, yet she breaks the tradition and displays female empowerment by appreciating his efforts to help her bring fulfillment into her life, but decides she is going to work on her own agenda (Jones). She does this by staying employed, stepping out of her comfort zone by confronting her prejudices, making her own decisions for enhancing her future, and standing up for herself against Deidres oppressive judgmentalness, and Xavier when he overstepped his boundaries. Kareema is a fiesty, modern, pansexual, and blunt southeast asian, who could not be further away from the stereotypical Indian woman. She states in the first episode, Honestly, I dont know whats sadder. The utter meaninglessness of this job, or your attempts to imbue it with meaning. But then I remember there is no sadness and were all just bags of dust in an infinite universe, (No Tomorrow). This shows her view on the purpose of life and fulfillment, along with religion and what is beyond. Throughout the series, Kareema makes comments or recalls certain activities she partakes in such as heavy partying and multiple sexual encounters. We even meet her mother and brother, who go against common societal beliefs of Indian normalities, as far as clothing and commentary, with the exception of her mother noting that if Kareema does not find a partner soon and marry, that it will be done for her, coinciding with traditions of indian culture. Alternatively, she falls in love with her brother s fiance, ultimately changing her outlook on life from a predominantly negative and cynical outlook, to a more happy and loving stance. Deirdre on the other hand is a strong woman who has a leader position within the show as the boss of the warehouse, displaying a woman in a position of power and authority, even over men. The viewer perceives Deidre to be sexy, cruel, yet hilarious, and at the end of the day, love struck for her assistant Hank. Her cruel words are seen when talking to Evie in the beginning of the series, stating, Well, youre not a leader. People dont listen when you talk. Youre too timid. You dont motivate people. You lack confidence. You dont command respect. Youre an inspiration to absolutely no one, (No Tomorrow). Although she insults Evies work ethic, and her personality, we see later on, that Deirdre seeks Evies help in attempting to get Hank to be interested in her. She even develops character wise socially, becoming more kind to her employees and establishes friendships within Evies circle. Both Kareema and Deidre defy their common stereotypes, and are presented as normal, working women, fac ing relationship and workplace issues, making them relatable to the audience. This is a refreshing change in comparison to other television series that depict females with biased, misogynist views, dress them in inappropriate clothing, or form their characters personas based off of their race and gender. We can also see these non stereotypical qualities present in the male supportive roles in No Tomorrow; Timothy and Hank, who are also best friends in the series. Timothy is at first presented to the audience as a biracial nerd, that writes for a technology magazine. His character is a timid, quiet, and awkward guy, who is heartbroken by Evie when she rejects his engagement. Although Timothy does not want to move on from Evie, he knows he has to try and put himself out there. He decides to strength his persona and go out with different women he meets online, in bars, at parties in hot tubs, and even in the workplace. By doing so, he statters his nerdy mold by improving his life, while also staying true to his characterization, by simply adding more confidence to his self-esteem, and even getting himself a few different lady friends. Hank is yet another character within this story that believes the apocalypse is coming, but at the hands of the Russian government and its nuclear power to bomb the world. Hank is an african American man, and paranoid conspiracy theorist, who believes the only way to survive this global act of terrorism is to seek shelter in a bunker he believes exists to protect the worlds leaders. He is also depicted as loyal, kind hearted, caring, loud, and a great best friend, as well as Deidres lover, but they face hardship due to workplace policies on relationships and dating coworkers. Hank defies traditional stereotypes associated with black people; he is not a thug, drug dealer, or rapper, he does not have a baby mama, and has not been in prison. Instead, Hank is a presentable, well dressed man who is employed, and simply wants to be happily in love, and safe from the Russians. Gupta Saab explains these characters and their differentiation in comparison to their stereotypes, which is spot on. He further iterations that No Tomorrow shows that no matter what you identify as, we are all still human beings. While some critics, like Jen Chaney, think otherwise, believing that the plot is overdone, and the characters are flat, lacking in dimension and development. Although I agree with Chaney up to a point, I fully endorse Saab in his final conclusion that the characters maintain subcultures that bend traditional stereotypical views associated with their identity, especially the supporting roles due to their increasing variation in comparison to Evie and Xavier, who still defy these social stigmas, just not to as high of a degree of the other actors. The differentiation among the cast gives the characters extra dimension, and meaning, making the show more interesting and capturing the hearts of a diverse audience.